ZM: Are there a number of running themes that often appear in your work?
SW: Death usually creeps in (as it will). It’s paradoxical to be making work you hope will live on with wet eyes, looking like it was born yesterday to then have it be about dying, disappearing, dissolving, dehydrating like fruit leather without the tangy sweetness. I say death but I mean mortality. Picture a pool in the woods, its backed up by hills and surrounded by trees. Bathers wade in the shallows and bob in the depths. People still unashamed of their bodies lay in various states between dressed and not. (There would be music playing if this wasn’t a picture.) It all seems on track with living it up until you see there’s a head about the size of a Volkswagen Bug floating face up on the glittering green lake. You now realise not only is she dead(the big head’s a lady) everyone pictured is long gone. The endless summer always ends. The picture is a relic of souls, once present, spirited away.
ZM: Do you have mixed feelings when you sell a painting and it disappears from your studio?
SW: For several years I had an event series in my studio called YardMeter wherein poetry was read and someone else’s art was installed. They were wonderful events at a time (the Great Recession) when people needed gatherings centered around culture rather than excuses to moan and wonder if they’d ever make money again. As the event series grew more strangers came. I had quite a lot of paintings stored and stacked and some were stolen. That produced mixed feelings... Its an odd compliment couched in violation. Poets?! Am I right? Just kidding I love poets, really I do...
ZM: What does a typical day look like when you are working on a new piece?
SW: Unfortunately my typical day starts by reading the news which seems to go from bad to worse since half of this country elected a megalomaniac who insists on taking up all of the oxygen while careening toward authoritarianism. Typically I read until one one of my dogs suggests walking them might be healthier than my pressing my face against the computer like I’m in a Munch painting or Bergman film. Lately I’ve used insomnia and loitering in bed as a time to ruminate over problems and potential solutions for paintings. Walking the dogs brings these latent bedhead inspirations back to the foreground. I like to work on several things at once so I start by looking at everything in progress and decide where to jump in. Queuing up the music is key and as soon as it starts the news disappears and I am immersed in making things better than how I found them.
ZM: Are there any particular artists that have influenced your work?
SW: Again music is a palpable companion to my process. I carry an ancient laptop between my 2 studios because it has one hundred years of my favourite music burned into its clamshell. At one time the laptop was white but now it looks like a filthy tie dye shirt from years of being handled by painty hands. I think the so called Muse is in the music but also she exists in my cells. While I'm painting the chorus of cells sing, Oh look he’s doing what helps him survive! Let's toss him some dopamine tainted ideas so he’ll die later than sooner. But that’s the interiority at work being an influencer you asked about external influence. Currently I feel the influence of Jenny Saville and Cecily Brown. Imagine if they had a child together! I love the mysterious paintings of Wendelin Wohlgemuth. I paint ghosts but Wendelin resuscitates them. Titus Kaphar and Njideka Akunyili Crosby should be household names for their innovations in collage based work. Martin Mull is a huge influence he charts a long path between childlike and cinematic. Fellow Texan Vernon Fisher is a marvel. Underrated Pop Artist Pauline Boty inspires as do the 3 Amy’s of Brooklyn contemporary painting. If you don’t know them keep an eye out Sillman, Bennet and Mahnick. They rock and back to music I am influenced by (often deploying their lyrics or song titles as painting titles) Thelonious Monk, Beck, Destroyer, Earl ‘Fatha' Himes, The Modern Airline, Red Garland, Lucinda Williams, Okkervill River, Yo La Tengo, Notnauts, Tribe Called Quest, Joni Mitchell, Coughdrop Exhange,The Breeders, Bob Dylan and The Beatles.
Shelton Walsmith is a painter and photographer working in Brooklyn, New York. His work has been published by The Paris Review, Knopf, Vintage, Rizzoli Books, Paris Vogue, Harper Collins, New York Times and others. He has exhibited in New York, San Francisco, Prague and Austin. In February 2025 he had his 4th one man show at sevenminusseven gallery in St Thomas USVI
ZM: Often your paintings have a literary theme. What do you aim to capture on the canvas?
SW: You know when you crack an egg and there’s a little bit of errant shell floating in it? The more you try to get at it with a fork or pinch at it with your fingers it evades you somehow; scooting and serpentining away from apprehension. That evasion is what I want to capture on canvas. “Science attempts to dispel ambiguity. Art seeks to preserve it.” Ironically the author of that quote is evading attribution. Just asked the internet who said it and it was like, Huh?
ZM: Has anyone described your work in a way that has surprised/delighted you?
SW: A return collector repeatedly called the work “genius” which surprised me but I provided them ample proof to the contrary which delighted them.
ZM: Where can we find your work?
SW: Online galleries Singulart in Paris, SaatchiArt in L.A and Artfinder in London.
ZM: Highs and lows of being a painter?
SW: You know its always feast or famine. Mostly famine.
ZM: You have a vast body of work - where do you find the energy?!
SW: Curiosity, survival, desperation, will, self deprecation, anything that’s erotic or smells good, impatience, improvisation, art history, tequila, keeping up with my baby legged corgis, loving my wife and son, hating Trump, New York City, reading real books, boxing, crawling, dancing, speculating wildly and experimenting constantly.
ZM: Are you currently working on a collection?
SW: Adding always to diverse series(s) long established, abandoned and revisited. Core curricula are spins on traditional genres portrait, landscape, still life and takes on art history. How to get all these in a single frame and have it admit to it’s pastichey, collage-like, ‘everything but the kitchen sink’ type mash up. Wish me luck. The chances of failing are vast. I can prove it!